Foundation
01 Program Architecture
Document FSSMS-FND-01All stagesRevision 4Version 0.3.3
Topic pages open on your jurisdiction, and requirements tables show its line. You can change this on any page.
The package is a management system, not a checklist. Its frame is Plan, Do, Check, Act on the ISO 45001 and CSA Z45001 pattern (ISO 45001:2018; CSA Z45001:19), keyed to the written occupational health and safety program that the applicable provincial or territorial statute requires of an employer of the department’s size (J03 OHS Policy and Program). NFPA 1550 and the specialty standards supply the content inside the frame; they are never the frame itself (NFPA 1550, 2024). The reason is historical: a voluntary checklist standard for fire service safety has existed since 1987 and the one compliance survey found that most departments had not adopted it and most adopters were not compliant, because a list tells a department what to have and not how to keep it alive (Fire Engineering, 1991; NFPA 1550, 2024, annex H).
- PLAN (ISO 45001 cl. 4 to 6)
- Program Profile Worksheet
- Gap Assessment
- Hazard Profile and Risk Register
- Baseline Metrics
- Policies and objectives
- DO (cl. 7 and 8)
- Program modules
- Safe work procedures
- Training and competency
- Program Improvement Teams
- CHECK (cl. 9)
- Inspections and indicators
- JOHSC inspection and review
- Internal audit, annual
- External review, triennial
- Learning: AAR, PIA, Learning Review
- ACT (cl. 10)
- Corrective Action Register
- Management Review
- Objectives, budget, roadmap
Also
- Objectives, budget, roadmap → Gap Assessment: next cycle
- Corrective Action Register → Safe work procedures: change notice to every member
Show the diagram source
flowchart LR
subgraph PLAN["PLAN (ISO 45001 cl. 4 to 6)"]
P1[Program Profile Worksheet]
P2[Gap Assessment]
P3[Hazard Profile and Risk Register]
P4[Baseline Metrics]
P5[Policies and objectives]
end
subgraph DO["DO (cl. 7 and 8)"]
D1[Program modules]
D2[Safe work procedures]
D3[Training and competency]
D4[Program Improvement Teams]
end
subgraph CHECK["CHECK (cl. 9)"]
C1[Inspections and indicators]
C2[JOHSC inspection and review]
C3[Internal audit, annual]
C4[External review, triennial]
C5[Learning: AAR, PIA, Learning Review]
end
subgraph ACT["ACT (cl. 10)"]
A1[Corrective Action Register]
A2[Management Review]
A3[Objectives, budget, roadmap]
end
P1 --> P2 --> P3 --> P4 --> P5 --> D1
D1 --> D2 --> D3 --> D4
D4 --> C1 --> C2 --> C3 --> C4
D4 --> C5
C1 & C2 & C3 & C4 & C5 --> A1 --> A2 --> A3
A3 -.->|next cycle| P2
A1 -.->|change notice to every member| D2The loop runs once a year as a whole (the annual cycle in 04 Annual Program Cycle and Calendar) and continuously in parts: every inspection, every near miss and every learning review enters the Act stage through the Corrective Action Register without waiting for the year to end.
These are not a chapter of the package. They are the method every module is built with, and the reader will find the same five ideas in every program note under the heading “Safety Differently in this program”, in every policy’s principles, and in every safe work procedure’s speak-up callout.
| Idea | What it means here | Where it shows up |
|---|---|---|
| Work-as-done over work-as-imagined | Procedures describe how the task is really done safely, written with the people who do it, after a learning-team session; a procedure the crew does not recognize is not finished (Hollnagel, 2014; Conklin, 2017) | 06 Program Improvement Teams section 5; the “work-as-done” sub-part of every program; Gap Assessment fabric elements |
| Safety-II and capacity | Safety is the presence of capacity to succeed under varying conditions, not only the absence of failure; each program names what makes its work go right and what erodes that capacity (staffing, time, equipment, fatigue, weather) and protects it as a control (Hollnagel, 2014) | The “capacity and margins” sub-part of every program; the hazard register’s conditions column |
| Just culture and the learning firewall | Errors, adaptations and workarounds are treated as information; learning information is never used for discipline; conduct concerns go to a separate process run by different people; decisions are judged by their quality, not their outcome (Reason, 1997; Marx, 2001; Dekker, 2014) | Every policy’s principles; Incident Investigation and Learning Program; Gap Assessment elements 15.5, 10.F, 15.F |
| Human factors | Situational awareness, decision-making under stress, crew resource management, fatigue, the normalization of deviance; taught to officers as their craft, not bolted on; the recurring NIOSH contributing factors (risk assessment, command, accountability, communications, procedures) are measured on routine incidents, not only after harm (Fire Engineering, 2023; Vaughan, 1996) | 05 Design Principles and Lessons Learned; supervisor competency in 01 Roles and Responsibilities section 7; indicators C1 to C6 |
| Organizational psychological safety | The shared belief that it is safe to speak up, ask, admit error and challenge; a condition created by leaders’ behaviour, meeting norms and the response to reports; distinct from psychological health (the CSA Z1003 factors) but linked to it (Edmondson, 1999DOI; CSA Z1003-13) | Every program’s indicator set carries at least one psychological-safety measure; every accountability table names how a member’s concern gets an answer back; indicator group D; every SWP’s speak-up callout |
The After the Call link. The learning engine of the package is the three-tier model from The Human Factor’s After the Call manual: Tier 1 After-Action Review (the crew, after every qualifying call, short and templated), Tier 2 Post-Incident Analysis (the department, for working fires, maydays, RIT deployments, injuries and high-potential near misses, led by trained people with a systems method), and Tier 3 Independent Learning Review (serious events, non-punitive, externally facilitated, under the learning firewall) (The Human Factor, 2026a). Every program note names which tier its triggers feed and the two or three AAR questions a crew asks after its task. The program-level description is Incident Investigation and Learning Program; the full method and triage rules are in Manual 02 - The Three Tiers and Event Triage.
| Part | Folder | What it is | Role in the loop |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foundations | 01 | This architecture; the standards and law map; design principles and lessons learned; glossary; bibliography | The frame and the evidence base |
| Governance | 02 | Roles and the RACI; JOHSC integration; accountability and reporting; the annual cycle and calendar; document control and records; Program Improvement Teams | Who owns what, on what cycle |
| Assessment | 03 | Program Profile Worksheet; Gap Assessment Tool; Hazard Profile and Risk Register Method; Baseline Metrics and Indicator Set; Safety Culture Baseline | Plan: where the department is, what it faces, what it will measure |
| Policies | 04 | Complete policy texts ready to sign, with customization points marked | Plan: what the department commits to and who is accountable |
| Programs | 05 | One module per hazard family or function, with every worksheet, checksheet, record, training outline and competency sign-off it needs | Do: the written, auditable system for each hazard |
| Safe work procedures | 06 | Short procedures a crew can use on the apparatus, written from work-as-done, each with a speak-up callout | Do: the controls at the point of work |
| Audit | 07 | Audit program; checklist master index and one checklist per category; inspection and review schedule; Corrective Action Register; management review | Check and Act: verification and closure |
| Implementation | 08 | Roadmap 0 to 36 months; business case and cost model; communication, training and rollout plan; first 90 days | How to get from here to there, costed |
| Forms and templates | 09 | Every form the programs reference, specified field by field so it can be rebuilt in any records system | The records that prove due diligence |
| Jurisdictions | 10 | The 00 Jurisdiction Index, one topic page per legal requirement with every province’s, territory’s and the federal version side by side, and one pack per jurisdiction | The law each department applies, kept current in one place |
Three rules hold the parts together.
- One taxonomy. The 20 categories in 02 Gap Assessment Tool are the audit categories in 02 Audit Checklist Master Index; a department compares its first gap assessment with its third audit without translation.
- One register. Every deficiency from an inspection, an audit, an investigation, a JOHSC recommendation, a near-miss report or a gap assessment lands in the Corrective Action Register with an owner, a date, a verifier and an escalation rule.
- One owner per element. Every program has one accountable line owner through its Program Improvement Team; the health and safety officer coordinates and verifies; the JOHSC participates and challenges; none of them replaces the line (01 Roles and Responsibilities).
A department can be honestly at Stage 1 and still be safe. The stages describe what is in place, not how good the firefighters are. Every policy, program element and checklist item carries its stage tag.
| Stage | What it contains | Stage gate test (from the Gap Assessment) | Typical time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 Foundation | The legal minimum plus the controls that stop people dying: the signed policy, the written program, the JOHSC running on its statutory cycle, the hazard register seeded, the Corrective Action Register open, the Stage 1 policies and programs (respiratory protection, PPE and contamination control, emergency operations safety with accountability, two-in/two-out, RIT, mayday, air management and rehab, apparatus and driving, incident reporting and investigation, training safety and live fire, medical evaluation), two or three Program Improvement Teams chartered, supervisor safety competency started | Every legislated element at the floor; every Critical element at Implementation 2 or better; first three teams chartered and reporting | Months 0 to 12 |
| Stage 2 Operating | Every Required module has a program, procedures, training, records and a team or named officer; indicators collected for every module; quarterly updates and annual appraisals on cycle; first internal audit done; management review held; culture survey at baseline and 12 months | Overall 60 percent or more; no category below 50 percent; effectiveness index 40 percent or more; internal audit done | Months 12 to 24 |
| Stage 3 Learning | The system corrects itself on evidence: external review completed and closed; learning reviews change procedures; near-miss reporting rising; succession measured in the teams; the department publishes lessons to peers; the program effectiveness evaluation that NFPA 1550 requires at least every three years is done (NFPA 1550, 2024, ch. 6) | Overall 75 percent or more; effectiveness index 60 percent or more; external review findings closed; culture survey repeated | Months 24 to 36 |
The maturity bands (Reacting, Complying, Building, Learning, Generative) describe how the department relates to its own system and map to the stages in 02 Gap Assessment Tool section 4 (Westrum, 2004DOI; Hudson, 2003).
Safety programs usually fail in the same place: the document is fine, nobody in the line owns it, nobody who does the work helped design it, nobody checks whether it changed anything, and the person who understood it retires. Program Improvement Teams close all four gaps at once (06 Program Improvement Teams). A standing team per program or specialty, led by a line officer as program manager with a front-line team lead and members, a JOHSC standing consultant, an assigned training officer and a clinician where needed, runs a six-step cycle: define, assess from work-as-done, plan, implement with JOHSC consultation, evaluate quarterly, revise and communicate. It reports quarterly, appraises annually into the budget, and builds succession through a named capability list, an understudy for every lead and a rotation rule. A department too small for standing teams names one officer per program with the same duties and cycle.
Every program carries a five-row accountability table that cannot be left blank: owner, doer, verifier, feedback, closure, followed by a loop test (“a member reports X on Monday; by when and through whom does the fix reach the whole department?”). Every accountability table also names how a concern raised by a member gets an answer back to that member. The audit scores the table as its own item. A program with no named owner or no closure rule is not finished, whatever else it contains. The Corrective Action Register’s open-item age is a standing management review input (ISO 45001:2018, cl. 10.2, 9.3).
| Level | Document | Approved by | Says |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OHS policy (one page, statutory) | Fire chief and chief administrative officer | What the department commits to |
| 2 | Policies (the policy set in 04) | Fire chief; council where the municipality requires | What the department commits to in each area and who is accountable |
| 3 | Programs (05) | Fire chief on the program manager’s recommendation, JOHSC consulted | The written, auditable system for a hazard family |
| 4 | Safe work procedures and standard operating guidelines (06) | Program manager, JOHSC consulted | How the task is done safely, written from work-as-done |
| 5 | Job aids, checklists and forms (09) | Program manager | The step list and the record at the point of work |
| 6 | Records | Custodian named per record | The evidence that it happened |
A lower level never contradicts a higher one; where it would, the higher one is wrong or out of date and the management of change procedure applies (05 Document Control and Records).
- Profile. Complete 01 Program Profile Worksheet with the chief, the senior officer responsible for health and safety and both JOHSC co-chairs: switch every module on or off with a reason, set the jurisdiction, collect the baseline facts.
- Gap assessment. Run 02 Gap Assessment Tool with the team of three; get the category profile, the band, the top ten gaps, the Stage 1 critical items and the 90-day actions.
- Hazard profile. Build the register from the seed inventory in 03 Hazard Profile and Risk Register Method, switched to the Profile; hold learning-team sessions on the ten highest-risk tasks.
- Stage 1 policies and programs. Adopt the OHS policy and the Stage 1 policy set; stand up the Stage 1 programs with their procedures, training and records; open the Corrective Action Register and load the critical items.
- Teams. Charter two or three Program Improvement Teams, prove the cycle for two quarters, then extend to every Required module.
- Measure. Declare the baseline from 04 Baseline Metrics and Indicator Set and run 05 Safety Culture Baseline; start the monthly page to the chief and the JOHSC.
- Audit. Run the first internal audit at month 12 against the same taxonomy; plan the external review for year three.
- Review. Hold the management review; set objectives, resource them, tell every member; re-run the gap assessment annually and move through the stages on evidence (01 Implementation Roadmap 0-36 Months).
- Not a substitute for the standards themselves. It tells the department which editions apply and what they require at the level needed to build a program; the department buys or reads the standards it adopts and cites them in its own documents (02 Standards and Law Master Map).
- Not legal advice. The chapters state statutory duties generically; each province’s, territory’s and the federal version is set out in Part 10 (00 Jurisdiction Index). Every section number must be confirmed against the current official text before adoption, and the collective agreement governs where it conflicts.
- Not an accreditation. It crosswalks to the CFAI criteria and can supply the Category 11 evidence and the annual appraisals, but accreditation is granted by the Commission on a peer team’s site visit, not by using this package (CPSE, 2019).
- Not a culture. The package builds the conditions (line ownership, work-as-done procedures, a just culture in writing, a measured loop) in which a safety culture can grow; the culture itself is made by what leaders do when someone speaks up.
Every program module with its policy, its safe work procedures, its forms, its audit checklist and the CFAI criteria it evidences (CPSE, 2019; CC marks a core competency). The policy column gives each policy’s title in 04 Policies without the “Policy -” prefix; the forms column describes each record, and the forms themselves are in Part 9 (09 Forms and Templates). The checklist column names the dedicated checklist; 02 Audit Checklist Master Index shows the category each one belongs to.
| # | Program module (05) | Policy (04) | Safe work procedures (06) | Forms (09) | Audit checklist (07) | CFAI criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Respiratory Protection | Respiratory Protection | SCBA Donning, Use and Air Management; SCBA Daily and After-Use Inspection and Cleaning; Fit Testing; Breathing Air Fill Station | SCBA inspection log; fit-test record; breathing air test record; respirator medical clearance (aggregate) | Checklist - Respiratory Protection | CC 6F.1, 6F.2 to 6F.5, 11A.4 |
| 2 | Protective Clothing and Equipment | Personal Protective Equipment and Contamination Control | Bunker Gear Routine Inspection and Cleaning; Bunker Gear Advanced Inspection; Bunker Gear Advanced and Specialized Cleaning and Repair; Bunker Gear Retirement and Records | Garment record; advanced inspection form; PPE issue record | Checklist - Protective Clothing and Equipment | CC 6F.1, 6F.3, 6F.4, 6F.5, 11A.9 |
| 3 | Decontamination and Contamination Control | Personal Protective Equipment and Contamination Control | On-Scene Preliminary Exposure Reduction (gross decon); Post-Call Station Decontamination (member, PPE, SCBA, tools, apparatus cab); Diesel Exhaust and Station Zoning | Incident decontamination log; station zoning plan | Checklist - Decontamination and Contamination Control | 11A.9 |
| 4 | Occupational Cancer Prevention, Exposure Tracking and Screening | Occupational Medical, Fitness and Wellness; Records, Privacy and Health Information | Exposure Reporting | Exposure report; lifetime exposure record; screening participation (aggregate) | Checklist - Cancer Prevention, Exposure and Screening | 11A.10, 11B.5 |
| 5 | Medical, Fitness and Wellness | Occupational Medical, Fitness and Wellness | Physician protocol (no SWP) | Medical clearance record (aggregate); fitness assessment record; return-to-duty form | Checklist - Medical, Fitness and Wellness | CC 11B.1, 11B.2, 11B.3, 11B.5, CC 11B.6 |
| 6 | Firefighter Rehabilitation at Incidents and Training | Emergency Operations Safety | Rehabilitation at Incidents | Rehab log | Checklist - Rehabilitation | 11A.8, CC 11B.1 |
| 7 | Psychological Health and Safety and Peer Support | Psychological Health and Safety | Peer support protocol (no SWP) | Potentially traumatic event exposure report; peer contact log (counts) | Checklist - Psychological Health and Peer Support | 11B.4, 11B.5 |
| 8 | Infection Control and Medical Response Safety | Incident, Injury, Exposure and Near-Miss Reporting and Investigation; Occupational Medical, Fitness and Wellness | Infection Control and Post-Exposure | Infectious exposure report; immunization record (aggregate) | Checklist - Infection Control and Medical Response | 11A.4 |
| 9 | Emergency Operations Safety | Emergency Operations Safety | Accountability and Personnel Accountability Reports; Two-In/Two-Out and Rapid Intervention; Mayday; Rehabilitation at Incidents | PAR log; ISO assignment record; post-incident analysis report | Checklist - Emergency Operations Safety | 11A.8, 11A.11, 11A.12, CC 5E.2, CC 5E.3 |
| 10 | Training Safety and Live Fire | Training and Competency | Live Fire Training Evolutions; Training Tower and Prop Inspection | Pre-burn plan; prop pre-use checklist; training injury report | Checklist - Training Safety and Live Fire | CC 8A.1, CC 8B.3, CC 8B.6, CC 8C.1, CC 8C.2, CC 11A.5 |
| 11 | Apparatus, Driving and Roadway Operations | Apparatus and Driving | Emergency Vehicle Response and Backing; Personal Vehicle Response (volunteers); Roadway Incident Scene Blocking | Daily apparatus check sheet; defect report; driver evaluation; collision report | Checklist - Apparatus, Driving and Roadway | CC 6C.1, CC 6D.1, CC 6D.5, 11A.8 |
| 12 | Facilities and Station Safety | Facilities | Diesel Exhaust and Station Zoning; Lockout and Shop Safety; Workplace Inspection | Station inspection checklist; deficiency log | Checklist - Facilities and Station Safety | CC 6B.3, 6B.2, 11A.3 |
| 13 | Hazardous Materials, CBRN and Energy Hazards | Hazardous Materials and WHMIS | Hazmat Entry and Decontamination; EV and Lithium Battery Fire; Solar PV and ESS; Downed Power Lines and Utility Emergencies | Air monitoring log; instrument calibration log | Checklist - Hazardous Materials and Energy Hazards | CC 5H.1, 5H.2, CC 5H.3 |
| 14 | Working at Heights and Fall Protection | Working at Heights | Ground Ladder Operations; Aerial Device Operations; Roof and Vertical Ventilation Operations; Fall Protection on Apparatus and at Heights | Fall protection equipment inspection record; ladder test record | Checklist - Working at Heights and Fall Protection | 11A.3, CC 6E.3 |
| 15 | Confined Space | Confined Space | Confined Space Entry and Rescue | Entry permit; gas detector bump and calibration log | Checklist - Confined Space, Trench and Rope Rescue | CC 5G.1, CC 5G.2 |
| 16 | Trench and Structural Collapse | Emergency Operations Safety | Trench Rescue | Collapse scene assessment form | Checklist - Confined Space, Trench and Rope Rescue | CC 5G.1, CC 5G.2 |
| 17 | Rope Rescue | Working at Heights | Rope Rescue Systems Rigging and Inspection | Rope and hardware log | Checklist - Confined Space, Trench and Rope Rescue | CC 5G.1, CC 5G.2 |
| 18 | Water, Ice and Swiftwater Rescue | Emergency Operations Safety | Ice Rescue; Swiftwater Rescue; Boat Operations | PFD and suit inspection record; vessel pre-use check | Checklist - Water, Ice and Marine Operations | CC 5G.1, CC 5G.2 |
| 19 | Wildland and Interface | Emergency Operations Safety | Wildland Deployment, LCES and Heat | Deployment hours log; LCES briefing card | Checklist - Wildland, Heat and Weather | CC 5K.1, 5K.2, CC 5K.3 |
| 20 | RPAS | Apparatus and Driving (conditional module) | RPAS Flight Operations | Flight log; battery log | Checklist - RPAS, Marine and ARFF (Conditional Modules) | 6E.1, CC 6E.3 |
| 21 | Workplace Violence | Workplace Violence and Harassment | Violent Scene Staging | Violence incident report; violence risk assessment | Checklist - Workplace Violence and Harassment | CC 7C.2, 7C.5 |
| 22 | Heat, Cold and Weather | Emergency Operations Safety | Rehabilitation at Incidents; Wildland Deployment, LCES and Heat | Heat index and wind chill log | Checklist - Wildland, Heat and Weather | 11A.8 |
| 23 | Hearing Conservation | Personal Protective Equipment and Contamination Control | Hearing protection steps within the SCBA and apparatus SWPs | Audiometry record (aggregate); noise survey | Checklist - Medical, Fitness and Wellness | CC 11B.1, CC 6F.1 |
| 24 | WHMIS and Hazard Communication (within Hazardous Materials, CBRN and Energy Hazards, element 5.7) | Hazardous Materials and WHMIS | Lockout and Shop Safety | Safety data sheet register; WHMIS training record | Checklist - Hazardous Materials and Energy Hazards | CC 11A.5 |
| 25 | Incident Investigation and Learning | Incident, Injury, Exposure and Near-Miss Reporting and Investigation | Exposure Reporting | Injury, exposure and near-miss report; investigation report; after-action review form; learning review report | Checklist - Incident Reporting, Investigation and Learning | 11A.6, 11A.7, 2A.5 |
| 26 | Workplace Inspections | Internal Responsibility and Accountability | Workplace Inspection | Inspection checklist; deficiency log | Checklist - Monitoring, Inspection and Indicators | 11A.2, 11A.3 |
| 27 | Contractor and Mutual Aid Safety | Contractors and Mutual Aid | Site rules (no SWP) | Contractor orientation record; agreement safety annex | Checklist - Contractors and Mutual Aid | CC 10B.1, 10B.3 |
| 28 | Marine Firefighting (conditional) | Emergency Operations Safety | Boat Operations | Vessel log; crew competency record | Checklist - RPAS, Marine and ARFF (Conditional Modules) | CC 5J.1, CC 5J.2 |
| 29 | Airport Rescue and Firefighting (conditional) | Emergency Operations Safety | ARFF procedures under the federal aviation regulations | Response-time test record; agent inventory | Checklist - RPAS, Marine and ARFF (Conditional Modules) | CC 5I.1, CC 5I.2 |
Cross-cutting policies with no single program: Occupational Health and Safety (the OHS policy); Internal Responsibility and Accountability; Risk Management and Hazard Assessment (delivered by 03 Hazard Profile and Risk Register Method); Right to Refuse Unsafe Work and Stop-Work Authority; Fatigue and Hours of Work (delivered through Medical, Fitness and Wellness and the specialty programs); Volunteer Members; Records, Privacy and Health Information; Program Review and Continuous Improvement (delivered by Management Review and 06 Program Improvement Teams).
| Element | Who | How |
|---|---|---|
| Owner | Fire chief | Adopts the architecture and the stage the department is at; chairs the management review |
| Doer | Senior officer responsible for health and safety | Maintains the package, the taxonomy and the module map; runs the annual cycle |
| Verifier | JOHSC (consulted on every adoption and change); internal audit (annually, that every module has an owner, a program, procedures and records); external review (triennial) | 01 Audit Program |
| Feedback | Management review outputs communicated to every member within 30 days; the stage and band published in the annual report | 03 Accountability and Reporting |
| Closure | Corrective Action Register | Any module without an owner or a closure rule is logged as a nonconformity with a date |
Concern-to-answer route. Any member can propose a change to the package through their officer, their JOHSC member or a Program Improvement Team; the senior officer responsible for health and safety answers within 30 days with what was decided and why.
This chapter relies on the following legal requirements, which differ by province and territory. Check your jurisdiction’s section on each topic page before adopting it.
| Topic | What to check in your jurisdiction | Page |
|---|---|---|
| OHS Policy and Program | The workforce size at which a written OHS policy and a written OHS program become mandatory, the elements the program must contain (including monitoring its own effectiveness), how often the policy is reviewed and with whom, and who receives a copy | J03 OHS Policy and Program |
| Joint Committee and Health and Safety Representative | The workforce size at which a joint committee (or a representative below it) is required, its composition, how often it must meet, its statutory functions, and the deadline for the employer’s written answer to its recommendations | J05 Joint Committee and Health and Safety Representative |
| Volunteer Firefighters | Whether volunteer firefighters count as workers under the OHS statute and toward its thresholds, and whether workers’ compensation covers volunteer and career firefighters, on what earnings basis and since when | J11 Volunteer Firefighters |
Center for Public Safety Excellence [CPSE]. (2019). Fire and emergency service self-assessment manual (10th ed.). Commission on Fire Accreditation International. https://cpse.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/10th-Edition-FESSAM-Strikethrough-Underline-v.4.pdf
Conklin, T. (2017). Workplace fatalities: Failure to predict. Pre-Accident Media.
CSA Group. (2013). CAN/CSA-Z1003-13/BNQ 9700-803/2013 (R2022), Psychological health and safety in the workplace: Prevention, promotion, and guidance to staged implementation (free to read from CSA Group and the Mental Health Commission of Canada). https://www.csagroup.org/store/product/CAN-CSA-Z1003-13-BNQ%209700-803-2013/
CSA Group. (2019). CSA Z45001:19 (R2023), Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use (adopts ISO 45001:2018 with Canadian deviations). https://www.csagroup.org/store/product/CSA%20Z45001:19/
Dekker, S. (2014). The field guide to understanding “human error” (3rd ed.). Ashgate.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
Fire Engineering. (1991). Compliance with NFPA 1500: Room for improvement (survey of 99 departments). https://www.fireengineering.com/firefighting/compliance-with-nfpa-1500-room-for-improvement/
Fire Engineering. (2023). The NIOSH 5: Beyond firefighter LODDs. https://www.fireengineering.com/?p=571739
Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety-II: The past and future of safety management. Ashgate.
Hudson, P. (2003). Applying the lessons of high risk industries to health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12(Suppl. 1), i7–i12.
International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 45001:2018, Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. https://www.iso.org/standard/63787.html
Marx, D. (2001). Patient safety and the “just culture”: A primer for health care executives. Columbia University.
National Fire Protection Association. (2024). NFPA 1550, Standard for emergency responder health and safety (consolidates NFPA 1500, 1521 and 1561). https://www.fire-police-ems.com/NFPA1550-2024.shtml
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.
The Human Factor. (2026a). After the Call, Manual 02: The three tiers and event triage [Unpublished manuscript].
Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press.
Westrum, R. (2004). A typology of organisational cultures. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl. 2), ii22–ii27. doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.009522